The concept of photonics and optoelectronic devices was first raised in the late 1980s. However, only in the last decade it has become one of the intensively research fields in the world, driven primarily by the rapid development of the communications technology . As transistor sizes shrink according to Moore’s law and internet-based communications continue to grow, the traditional technology based on copper has been pushed to its limit and can no longer satisfy growing demands for high-speed and largebandwidth communications applications. Under this circumstance, photonics is destined to have a central role in modern communications applications owing to its highspeed transmission and outstanding low-noise properties. Recent advances and breakthroughs prove that photonics could deliver low-cost and high-performance solutions for the communication industries, including fiberto-the-premise, chip-to-chip, and even intra-chip applications .
Currently, the majority of long-distance data transmission is in the 1300 – 1550 nm wavelength range, corresponding to window of minimum optical loss for silica optical fibers. Therefore, photonic devices operating at this range of wavelength are aggressively pursued so that they can be directly connected to external servers without wavelength conversion. So far, various photonic devices have been developed in this wavelength regime, including light emission sources [3, 4], optical modulators , and other passive components [4, 5]. Among these devices, photodetector (PD) is placed at the end of the optical path to convert optical into electrical signals, and the conversion quality greatly affects the overall performance of the entire system. In general, an ideal PD should possess following features: high responsivity or sensitivity, high detection speed, large bandwidth, high quantum efficiency
(QE), low dark currents (small stand-by power consumption and low noise level), and low applied voltage-bias requirements. In particular, for telecommunications application, a responsivity > 0.1 A/W (corresponding to external QE of 10% and 8% at wavelength 1300 nm and 1550 nm, respectively), dark currents < 1 μA and bias voltage < 5 V [6, 7].
Another important criterion for a PD is its compatibility with the complementary-metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology [8, 9] to take the advantages of: (1) good noise immunity, low power dissipation and good reliability of the CMOS fabrication process; (2) direct integration with other circuit components without changing foundry process and (3) perhaps most importantly, high packing density and scalability, which is essential in constructing very-large-scale-integration systems .
To achieve high performance and CMOS-compatible photodetection, an appropriate material system and fabrication technology is necessary, which have been aggressively investigated in the past 30 years. The commonly adopted photodetection mechanism utilizes the interband transition from the band gap of a semiconductor to absorb the photon, and the photodetection wavelength can be adjusted by selecting semiconductor materials with suitable band gap or creating the band gap with band engineering techniques. Presently, a number of semiconductor systems has been verified with photodetection capability in the telecommunications wavelengths (1300 – 1550 nm) including Si [10, 11], Ge [2, 12], InGaAs [1, 2, 13] and HgCdTe .
Recently, low-dimensional materials such as graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNT), and surface plasmons have been explored for next-generation PDs. Graphene is an atomically thin film with a unique band structure [14, 15], leading to an ultra-high carrier mobility and a wide optical absorption spectrum. Carbon nanotube is a one-dimensional (1D) structure with a diameterdependent tunable band gap from ultraviolet to infrared . The excitons are effectively excited to achieve fast photodetection . Ultra-high responsivity and large bandwidth have been demonstrated, but the full potential of these low-dimensional materials has yet to be realized [18, 19].
Surface plasmons are collective excitations of electrons at the surface of a metal as a result of interaction with incident light, enhancing and focusing electromagnetic waves in their vicinities [20, 21]. Plasmonics are of great technological interest as an interface between photonics and electronics to enhance light-matter interaction. Plasmonic PDs are of small footprint, high responsivity per volume and potentially high-speed [22, 23].
In this paper, we review PD technologies based on the above-mentioned material systems. In Section 2, the photodetection technologies based on the four semiconductor materials, InGaAs, Ge, all-Si and HgCdTe are reviewed, including their material properties and various PD structures. In Section 3, the development of PDs based on lowdimensional materials is introduced, and we review different plasmonic PDs, including quantum-tunneling based PDs in Section 4. We discuss in Section 5 the performances, pros and cons of PDs based on the different material systems, and a conclusion is presented in Section 6.
2 Semiconductor PDs
2.1 InxGa1–xAs PDs
InxGa1–xAs alloy is currently the most mature material system for photodetection at telecommunications wavelengths. InxGa1–xAs alloy is a variable band gap III–V semiconductor with excellent electronic transport and optical properties. The band gap of InxGa1–xAs can be tuned for wavelengths between 0.85 – 3.6 μm, making it ideal for near-infrared photodetection . The development of InxGa1–xAs fabrication technology with various PD structures, including p-doped-intrinsic-n-doped (p – i – n), metal–semiconductor–metal (MSM) and avalanche photodetector (APD), will be briefly reviewed.
The InxGa1–xAs ternary system is attractive for its wide energy gap, ranging from 0.35 eV for pure InAs to 1.43 eV for pure GaAs. By simply changing the alloy composition, the photodetection responsivity can be maximized at the desired wavelength to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio [25, 26]. Especially for the In0.53Ga0.47As (Eg = 0.73 eV) alloy, which gives a complete lattice-match to the InP substrate, and outstanding photodetection performance for wavelengths between 1.0 – 1.7 μm . Low background doping level and high carrier mobility have also been achieved for this system at room temperature to achieve good signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) under high-speed operation . In optical communication applications, PD based on InxGa1–xAs currently outperforms Si and Ge owing to its direct band gap properties and relatively large absorption coefficient, making it capable of covering both the C and L bands (see Figure 1) [28, 29], compared to Si and Ge that only cover the C band .
However, it is difficult to integrate InxGa1–xAs with CMOS circuits due to the large lattice mismatch between the III–V material and Si substrates, as InP/Si has an 8.1% mismatch. Over the past few decades, a lot of researches have been done to resolve the compatibility issue. The easiest way to integrate III–V with the CMOS technology uses epitaxial growth directly on an SOI substrate, but this leads to a large strain and high dislocation density, therein reducing the performance and reliability of the PD . Lateral overgrowth  and an intermediate buffer layer  are also used to improve the crystal quality, but the performance is unsatisfactory. Later, flip-chip integration is used to mate the surface of the detector with the SOI substrate to improve performance . The major drawback of this technique is that the integration process is carried out on a wafer level, which is time consuming and expensive. Today, a heterogeneous integration approach using wafer-bonding process is commonly adapted to obtain a defect-free III–V thin film that can be lithographically integrated with the Si substrate [34–37]. With modern metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (CVD) technology or molecular beam epitaxy, the InxGa1–xAs absorption layer can even be selectively grown on Si substrate .
Different types of PD structures based on the InxGa1–xAs ternary system have been developed to operate at telecommunications wavelength [4, 27]. The classic type is the p – i – n structure shown in Figure 2(a), which relies on both carrier drift and diffusion to generate photocurrents. Effenberger et al. proposed the use of a dual-depletion region to improve the device speed of the InGaAs/InP p–i–n detectors, with large device dimensions and high dark currents as a tradeoff . Later, through evanescent-coupling of the p – i – n detector with the Si waveguide, a high responsivity of 1.1 A/W at 1550 nm was reported, with a low dark current of 10 pA and high QE of over 90% . An alternative Si-waveguide butt-coupled PD with a 9 GHz 3 dB-bandwidth at –4 V bias and a high detection speed of 10 Gb/s has been demonstrated . Furthermore, coupling the p – i – n PD with a high-Q cavity resonator could reduce the device dimension while maintaining high QE. Eighty-four percent QE was achieved by using a 200 Å InGaAs absorption layer [24, 40, 41].
MSM PDs consist of interdigitated Schottky metal contacts on top of an absorption layer, which are compatible with the current field-effect transistor technology as shown in Figure 2(b). The MSM PDs generally have higher speed and lower dark currents than p-i-n PDs due to its low capacitance, but suffer from smaller responsivity . Initially, thin strained layers of GaAs and AlGaAs were used to create a higher Schottky barrier on InGaAs, which resulted in high leakage currents and low gains due to a significant trap density [43, 44]. Later, thin layers of undoped InAlAs were used for barrier enhancement, which significantly improved the device performance due to the latticematching between InAlAs and the InP substrate [45, 46]. Kim et al. reported a back-illuminated InGaAs MSM PD with a record responsivity of 0.96 A/W and 92% QE at 5 V bias, although the bandwidth is only 4 GHz . Coupling with a cavity resonator can increase the bandwidth up to 100 GHz . Recently, with flip-chip bonding of InGaAs MSM diode on the Si substrate, a responsivity of 0.74 A/W at 1550 nm and 1 μA dark current under low applied bias (∼1 V) has been achieved . Cheng et al. demonstrated an InGaAs MSM PD that is monolithically integrated with an InP waveguide that fully covers the C and L bands with a nearly flat wavelength-dependent responsivity .
APDs are p-n junction photodiodes shown in Figure 2(c), operated at high electric fields in order to achieve photocurrent gains of > 1 , where one incident photon can generate more than one electron-hole pair . In high speed long distance optical communication systems, APD is normally the best choice owing to its large internal gain, which provides sensitivity of 5 – 10 dB higher than the p – i – n photodiode . Larger bandwidth and higher performance have been reported at 1300 – 1550 nm for various InxGa1–xAs APD structures, such as separated absorption grading charge multiplication , δ-doped separated absorption grading multiplication , InAlAs/InGaAs super-lattice structures , separated absorption charge multiplication structure with quantumdot resonant cavity , and floating guard ring structures [57, 58]. Using narrow InGaAs multiplication layer
widths, a very low dark current of 10 – 300 nA with a 3 dB-bandwidth of 80 GHz was achieved . Recent efforts focused on extending the capability of InGaAs APDs for error-free, high-speed modern communication (∼50 Gb/s) as well as single photon detection systems [60, 61].
2.2 Ge-on-Si PDs
Germanium (Ge) is another photodetection material system at the telecommunications wavelength. Today, fully CMOS-integrated Ge PDs are commercially available and shared the market with InGaAs PDs. In terms of material properties, Ge is more suitable for photodetection than InGaAs. Although Ge is an indirect band gap semiconductor, it has a small band gap of ∼0.8 eV, hence granting Ge the capability for photodetection at telecommunications wavelength without band gap engineering. On the other hand, the lattice mismatch between Ge and Si is 4.2% that is relatively smaller than that of InGaAs/Si, making Ge a better choice to be integrated with the CMOS circuit.
In order to develop high-performance Ge-on-Si PDs, the 4.2% lattice mismatch between Ge and Si has to be reduced. This lattice mismatch causes high surface roughness and threading dislocation densities, which degrades the device performance . In 1984, Luryi et al. first obtained high quality epitaxial Ge-on-Si using a graded SiGe buffer layer to reduce the threading dislocation density . This method is further improved by adjusting the Ge composition, growth temperature and using an additional ex situ chemical-mechanical polish step [64–66], and as a result, a low threading dislocation density of < 106 cm–2 has been achieved . Alternatively, a twostep epitaxial growth technique has also been developed to directly grow Ge on Si without using the buffer layer, and a similar dislocation density ∼106 – 107 cm–2 has been obtained [67, 68]. In addition, this two-step method can introduce tensile strain to the Ge layer during fabrication, which could transform Ge from an indirect to a direct band gap material (see Figure 3), hence greatly improving the optoelectronic properties of Ge [69–73]. Other techniques such as H2 annealing are also adopted to improve the Geon-Si quality [74–76].
Ge PDs have structures that similar to InGaAs PDs, including the p – i – n, MSM and APD. The early Ge p – i – n PDs used a SiGe buffer layer which suffer from high dark currents (∼0.2 – 0.3 μA) due to large thermionic emission even from high quality Ge crystals . Later, Liu et al. discovered that a thin Ge layer of the order of 1 – 2 μm could establish a strong built-in electric field, enough for carriers to easily overcome the recombination process at the lattice defects, hence reducing the overall dark currents and significantly improved the device sensitivity over a large bandwidth . An internal QE of above 90% in the wavelength range of 1250 – 1340 nm was reported at 0 V bias as shown in Figure 4(a) . Coupling the device with a resonant cavity could extend the photodetection wavelength to 1538 nm with a moderate QE of 59% . Coupling the photodiode to a waveguide could further improve the responsivity and bandwidth while maintaining a small dark current. A responsivity larger than 1 A/W was achieved [79, 80], with a bandwidth > 30 GHz [80, 81], and a low dark current density 0.2 nA . Recently, with the help of GeSn active layers,high-performance Ge p–i–n PDs are fabricated to extend the photodetection to the longer wavelengths up to 1800 nm [83, 84].
The performance of Ge MSM PDs is initially limited by the high dark currents due the low hole Schottky barrier height as a result of Fermi level pinning near the valence band edge. The dark currents can be larger than 150 μA even after coupling the photodiode with a waveguide [79, 85]. Efforts were made to modulate the Schottky barrier height in order to suppress the dark currents. Oh et al. used an amorphous Ge layer to increase the Schottky barrier height  and suppressed the dark currents by two orders of magnitude. Similarly, Liah et al. used an amorphous Si layer and reduced the dark currents by three orders of magnitude . Recently, Ang et al. utilized a Si:C layer as shown in Figure 4(b) and reported an extremely low dark current of 11.5 nA with a high responsivity of 0.76 A/W and a moderate QE ∼60% [88, 89]. Besides manipulating the Schottky barrier, an alternative method of reducing the dark currents is through the adoption of the dopant-segregation technique. For example, implanting and segregating the As and boron/sulfur dopants can suppress the total dark currents by 3–4 orders of magnitude as shown in Figure 4(c) [90, 91]. With this modern fabrication technology, the responsivity of Ge MSM PDs had been boosted to 1.76 A/W at 5 V bias .
Ge-on-Si APDs combined the excellent optical absorption of Ge with the outstanding carrier-multiplication properties of Si. Since Si has a much smaller ionization ratio k-value of ∼0.1 than III–V materials such as InP with k-value of ∼0.5, the Ge-on-Si APD is believed to be better than III–V APDs in the high-speed optical communication systems in terms of higher gain bandwidth product and better sensitivity . With a simple GexSi1–x/Si strainedlayer structure, the multiplication factor can be larger than 50 [93, 94]. Kang et al. achieved a gain-bandwidth product (Figure 4(d)) of 340 GHz with a small k-value of 0.09, and a sensitivity of –28 dBm at 10 Gb/s . Assefa et al. manipulated the optical and electrical field within the Ge layer, and achieved 70% noise reduction with a high photodetection speed of over 30 GHz at only 1.5 V bias . With state-of-the-art fabrication technology, the multiplication gain has been boosted to 680 at 8 V bias , the speed increased up to 43 Gb/s at 1550 nm with bit-error rate 10–12. Meanwhile, the input power can be reduced to as low as –35 dBm .
2.3 All-Si PDs
Si crystal has a relatively large indirect band gap ∼1.1 eV, corresponding to a cut-off wavelength below 1100 nm . As such, Si is not the most suitable material for PDs operating at the telecommunications wavelength compared to the direct band gap III–V alloy such as InGaAs or Ge which has a smaller band gap. Nevertheless, all-Si PDs have the advantage of monolithic integration with the standard CMOS technology without changing the fabrication process, and hence could significantly reduce the fabrication costs . In this section, a number of all-Si PDs operating at the telecommunications wavelength based on different physical mechanisms, including mid-band gap absorption (MBA), surface-state absorption (SSA), internal photon emission (IPE) and two-photon absorption (TPA), will be reviewed.
MBA PDs are developed based on the fact that high energy particles could introduce defect states located within the band gap of the intrinsic Si crystal, thus enabling detection of sub-band gap optical radiation. Fan et al. first discovered in 1959 that the damaged Si could interact with sub-band gap illumination to generate photocurrents . Later, the MBA mechanism was shown to exist for both donor and acceptor defects [101, 102], where di-vacancies and interstitial clusters were the two
primary defect types contributing to the sub-band gap photon absorption . Knight et al. first proposed an all-Si MBA p – i – n photodiode with the defect states introduced by ion-implantation , and optimized its performance by post-annealing and exploiting helium ion as the implantation source [105, 106] (Figure 5(a)). Further, adding an external ring resonator cavity could increase the total optical absorption and achieve a complete C + L band coverage [107, 108]. With modern fabrication technology, Geis et al. were able to reduce the transversal cross-section of the waveguide to increase the absorption length and reduce carrier recombination, making the performance of the MBA PDs comparable with the III–V alloy and Ge PDs. They demonstrated a responsivity of 0.5–10 A/W at 1550 nm with a 60 V bias, and a bandwidth of > 35 GHz . An extremely small bit error rate < 10–12 is also reported . Note that besides ion implantation, defect states can also be generated in Si by roughening the surface using ultrafast laser pulses [111, 112].
SSA PDs are based on a similar principle with the MBA PDs, where surface states are introduced into the band gap of the intrinsic Si, extending the optical absorption to longer wavelengths. It has been demonstrated that a large number of surface states are present for a clean Si or Ge surface and vanish as the surface becomes rough or oxidized [113–115]. By increasing the overlap between the optical mode and the waveguide surface using a small conduction arm, Baehr-Jones et al. first built the SSA PD (Figure 5(b)) in ultrahigh vacuum environment . They reported a responsivity of 36 mA/W at 1575 nm under 11 V bias, and a corresponding dark current of 12 μA. Further improvements can be done by coupling the SSA PD with an external resonator cavity. A responsivity of 0.12 mA/W was achieved even at 0 V bias . Ideally, surface states should have larger carrier mobilities and less recombination sites compared to the bulk defect states in the MBA PDs, resulting in higher detection speed and larger QE . However, SSA is very sensitive to the Si surface conditions as well as the external temperature [114, 117], which requires a delicate fabrication process that hinders mass production. Presently, the SSA PD is still in its infancy.
IPE PDs rely on the principle that photo-excited electrons in metal can gain energy higher than the Schottky barrier and subsequently move into the conduction band of the semiconductor, as shown in Figure 5(c). The IPE PDs are widely implemented in infrared imaging systems due to the high switching speed and convenience in fabrication . In optical communications, however, it is not favored due to the very low QE as the photo-excited electrons do not have enough energy or momentum to overcome the Schottky barrier [120, 121]. Elabd et al. first proposed to use ultra-thin metal films (∼2 nm) to increase the carrier escape-probability of the photo-excited electron . A responsivity of 250 mA/W at 1500 nm was achieved with a trade-off in low total optical absorption. Later, metalporous silicon structures were exploited to improve the QE to ∼14.4% by increasing the surface-to-volume ratio . Recently, it has been demonstrated that the QE can be significantly improved by coupling the IPE PD with a Si waveguide . A responsivity of 4.6 mA/W at 1550 nm was reported with –1 V bias. The corresponding dark current is fairly low at 3 nA [125, 126]. Although current IPE PDs are limited by small bandwidths (∼3 GHz in Ref. ), it has the potential for high-speed communications due to the fast photoemission mechanism.
TPA PDs are based on the nonlinear TPA process as shown in Figure 5(d). Boggess et al. first discovered that an electron can absorb two photons (having individual energies below the semiconductor band gap) approximately at the same time, and reach the excited state in the conduction band . Reintjes et al. first measured the TPA coefficient β = 1.5 cm/GW using 1060 nm picosecond laser pulse . Later, β = 0.8 cm/GW was demonstrated at telecommunications wavelength (∼1500 nm) [130, 131]. Although the nonlinear behavior of the TPA offers the potential in ultra-short laser pulse detection, the small TPA coefficient hinders applications in optical communications. Coupling the TPA PDs with Si waveguide  or a high-Q resonant cavity can improve the responsivity to 16 mA/W at 1500 nm [133, 134]. However, it is limited by the low detection speed ∼0.1 GHz due to the high resistivity of the device . With the continuous progress in the TPA APD development, the weak effect of the TPA is significantly amplified in the carrier multiplication process and the sensitivity is improved [135–137]. All-Si TPA PDs are also proposed as profilometers at both 1300 and 1550 nm in detecting ultra-short pulse [138, 139]. At the current stage, the research of the TPA PD is still focused on amplifying the TPA effect to improve the responsivity and speed.
2.4 HgCdTe PDs
In terms of material properties, HgCdTe is probably the most promising semiconductor for infrared photodetection in the spectrum of 0.7 ∼ 25 μm. HgCdTe was first synthesized in 1959 by Lawson et al. . At present, we are already into the development of the third-generation HgCdTe PD products .
The HgCdTe system is believed to be suitable for infrared photodetection due to the following reasons :
HgCdTe has an adjustable band gap, achieved through tuning the composition of each element, thereby granting the flexibility in spectral response over a wide infrared spectrum;
High lattice-matching (∼0.2% mismatch) between HgCdTe tertiary alloy and the CdZnTe substrate ensures high-quality crystal growth. In fact, it is the only material that has nearly the same lattice constant regardless of the composition of each element; and
Moderate dielectric permittivity ensures small device capacitance, and low thermal expansion coefficient ensures device stability.
The first and second generations of the HgCdTe PDs consist of a linear array of photoconductors and a twodimensional (2D) array of photovoltaic diodes, which are mainly used for thermal imaging at far infrared wavelengths (> 8 μm) [13, 141]. Only in the third generation of HgCdTe PDs, especially during the development of the APD (see Figure 6(a)), the potential of HgCdTe in nearinfrared photodetection is explored. For HgCdTe with a band gap of around 0.9 eV (corresponding to 1370 nm), the energy required to excite an electron from the valence band to the conduction band is identical to the energy to excite a carrier from the split-off band to the valence band (Figure 6(b)). This property provides the HgCdTe APDs a competitive advantage in the asymmetry between the avalanche gain of holes and electrons in the multiplication process. An ionization ratio k-value of 0.1 or less can be achieved, resulting in excellent SNR , and a figureof-merit better than that for the InGaAs and Ge APDs. At present, the HgCdTe APDs for photodetection at 1060, 1300, and 1550 nm have all been fabricated using liquid phase epitaxy or molecular beam epitaxy [144, 145]. The responsivity can reach 13.1 A/W with dark currents of 66 nA at 77.7 V bias, and the gain can be larger than 100 at room temperature .
Despite the outstanding performance, the HgCdTe APDs faced serious problems in mass production due to the weak Hg–Te bond as well as safety concerns for the highly toxic compounds. Also, large bulk areas and high operating voltages significantly increase power consumption of the APDs. In addition, high quality HgCdTe is usually grown on the CdZnTe substrate, which is difficult to integrate with the silicon readout circuit due to different thermal expansion coefficients and a 19% lattice mismatch [146, 147]. Finally, the fabrication cost associated with the CdZnTe substrate is also much higher than Si and Ge.
3 Photodetectors based on low-dimensional materials
Low-dimensional materials provide a fascinating ground between molecular and bulk materials. Interesting properties such as excitons, which are often negligible in bulk materials, are greatly accentuated in low-dimensional materials. These unique electronic and optical properties make photodetection promising even in an extremely
small nanostructure that is only one atomic-layer thin (graphene) or just nanometers in two (carbon nanotube) or three dimensions (quantum dot (QD)). In this section, we briefly review two photodetection technologies based on graphene and carbon nanotube, and also give a glimpse of other low-dimensional materials such as metal chalcogenides, nanowire, and QD.
3.1 Graphene-based PDs
Since its first isolation in 2004, graphene is rapidly becoming an appealing material for photonics and optoelectronics due to its ultra-high bandwidth photodetection capability . Graphene’s ultrafast carrier mobility, tunable optical properties via electrostatic doping, low dissipation and good stability make it an ideal platform for developing high speed PDs for optical communications . In addition, graphene is compatible with CMOS technology, making it convenient for low-cost and large-scale integration into the CMOS circuits [149–151].
The band structure of a single layer graphene can be calculated with the tight-binding description, where the conduction and valence band meet at the six Dirac points of the Brillouin zone as shown in Figure 7(a) . Near the Dirac point, the band diagram possesses linear energymomentum dispersion. Due to this peculiar dispersion property, the electron in graphene behaves like a massless Dirac fermion, with high carrier mobility at ∼1/300 speed of light. Besides the excellent carrier dynamics, the gapless band structure makes graphene capable of broadband photodetection from UV to even terahertz region . High optical absorption coefficient of 7 × 105 cm–1 has been found from 300 to 2500 nm, which is much higher than conventional semiconductors .
On the other hand, due to the short interaction length of the atomic thin layer, the optical absorption of a single layer graphene is only 2.3% in visible and infrared region . The opacity of graphene is solely determined by the fine structure constant α = e2/hc, which is a result of its two-dimensional nature and gapless band spectrum. Such a small absorption rate, although superior for an atomic thin-layered structure, is insufficient for high performance photodetection. Many researches have been performed to improve the optical absorption rate of the graphene . It is found that the optical absorption of graphene layers is linearly proportional to the number of layers (see Figure 7(b)) [153, 154]. The total absorption of the multi-layer graphene can be treated equivalently as a superposition of each individual layer due to the weak van der Waals force between the adjacent layers. This property offers a convenient way to tune the absorption of the graphene PD without generating much noise. Other approaches such as integrating with other optical structures (e.g. plasmonic structure [155, 156], optical waveguide [149, 151] and optical cavity ), or utilizing the intrinsic plasmonic properties of graphene by patterning the graphene into nanostructure , or implementing hybrid material systems (e.g. polymer, nanoparticle, QD) to increase the light harvesting and facilitate the exciton separation , have also been reported in the literature [148, 152].
Generally, the physical mechanisms in the photodetection of graphene can be characterized into three major categories: photoelectric, photo-thermoelectric and photo-bolometric effects .
Photoelectric effect: graphene typically aligns lon-
gitudinally between two electrodes, whereby the photo-excited electrons form exciton are separated and propelled under external bias to create photocurrent [160–162]. For the area far away from the metal–graphene junction, the photoconductive effect dominates the photoresponse, where the graphene behaves like a conventional semiconductor . On the other hand, for the area beneath and close to metal–graphene junction, the photoresponse is dominated by the photovoltaic effect , where the Fermi energy of graphene is shifted according to the work function of the metal contact  and subsequently a built-in voltage can be established to separate excitons without an external bias . Currently, most of the graphene PDs are fabricated based on this mechanism;
Photo-thermoelectric effect: Due to the strong electron–electron interaction, a photo-excited electron–hole pair can result in ultrafast heating of the carriers in graphene [167, 168]. During the long transport length for the hot carrier to interact, multiple excitations can further occur [167, 169]. By forming inhomogeneous thermoelectric power across the graphene channel, these hot carriers can produce a built-in bias based on Seebeck effect for a graphene interface junction  or a dual-gate graphene  to generate photocurrent;
Photo-bolometric effect: The bolometric effect is associated with the light-induced change in the conductance via optical heating , instead of direct photocurrent generation. The temperaturedependent conductance can be attributed to the change in both carrier mobility and carrier density. Yan et al.  explicitly demonstrated this effect on a uniform graphene without using graphene–metal junction to exclude the contribution from photoelectric and photo-thermoelectric effect. Freitag et al.  further distinguished the photoelectric, photo-thermal, and bolometric effect on a single layer graphene at room temperature.
Note that besides the three major mechanisms, other mechanisms may be responsible for graphene photodetection, including photogating, tunneling, and plasma-waveassisted mechanism. Readers can refer to Ref. [148, 152] for more detailed information.
The first graphene PD was reported by Xia et al., which is a transistor-based PD made out of single or double graphene layers, demonstrating an ultrafast photodetection of up to 40 GHz . Mueller et al. have developed an interdigitated metal–graphene–metal structure to break the mirror symmetry of the internal electric field in the conventional field-effect transistor channel . This device operated at 1550 nm with a responsivity of 6.1 mA/W. Coupling the PD with a microcavity resonator increased the total absorption to 40%, but with small bandwidth as a tradeoff . Konstantatos et al. covered the graphene layer with a thin film of colloidal QDs to improve the device gain to 108 with a responsivity of 107 A/W, but the response speed was limited . Later, Gan et al. developed an evanescently-coupled graphene-waveguide structure and achieved a responsivity of > 0.1 A/W, a uniform response between 1450 and 1590 nm, and high speed of 12 Gb/s . Alternatively, Wang et al. reported a responsivity of 0.13 A/W at 1.5 V bias with a graphene/Siheterostructure waveguide PD . Kim et al. further improved the responsivity to 0.4 ∼ 1.0 A/W in a broad spectral range from ultraviolet to near-infrared using an allgraphene p-n vertical junction structure as shown in Figure 8. The performance of such device was consistent under 6 months operations . A similar structure was also demonstrated by Liu et al., showing a responsivity of > 1 A/W from visible to mid-infrared wavelengths at room temperature .
Note that our primary focus in this review has been on PDs in the telecommunications wavelength. For graphene, however, efforts are also spent on developing PDs in the terahertz (e.g. graphene-based bolometers, terahertz detectors), which is not achievable by other conventional semiconductors. Interested readers can refer to the recent reviews for more details [148, 152].
3.2 CNT-based PDs
CNTs, first discovered by Iijima et al. in 1991 , are nearly ideal 1D systems with diameters of a few nanometers and lengths that be scaled up to centimeters. By controlling the arrangement of the carbon atom structure with respect to their axis (e.g. indices (n, m) ), CNTs could be direct band gap semiconductors, or even metals with nearly ballistic conduction . The band gap of the CNT is inversely proportional to its diameter (the band gap ranges from 0.2 to 1.5 eV for CNT diameter from 0.8 to 3 nm), which allows CNT photodetection from ultraviolet to infrared [17, 179]. Besides the tunable band gap, CNT intrinsically has high absorption coefficient 104 – 105 cm–1 in infrared region, which is one order of magnitude larger than the conventional semiconductors .
Photoexcitation creates an electron in the conduction band, leaving a hole in the valence band. For the bulk semiconductors, the electron–hole interaction is negligible and they behave like free carriers . On the other hand, for low-dimensional materials, especially CNTs [182, 183] and QDs , substantial columbic interaction due to the strong quantum confinement between the electron and hole “quasi-particles” binds them into excitons , offering an alternative valley for charge transfer in the lowdimensional materials. Excitons can be efficiently formed in CNTs under photoexcitation due to the 1D confinement and subsequently decay into free electrons and holes. Photocurrent can be then produced via external bias  or photovoltage can be created by the build-in field near Schottky barrier or p-n junctions [187, 188]. The exciton binding energy is also inversely proportional to the diameter of the CNT, and can be further tuned by adjusting the electric field or the dielectric constant of the environment [189, 190]. In addition, carrier multiplication or ro-
High-performance infrared PDs based on CNTs are usually fabricated with molecular beam epitaxial or CVD, and the photodetection mechanism is attributed to thermal or photo effects. For the thermal effect, the current is generated as a result of the change in conductance due to the temperature change under light illumination. St-Antoine et al. demonstrated a thermopile using single-walled CNT (SWCNT) thin film with a detectivity of 2 × 106 cm·Hz1/2/W in the visible and near-infrared region . Lu et al. showed a bolometer with a higher detectivity 3.3 × 106 cm·Hz1/2/W at 1000 – 1300 nm using a multiwall-CNT (MWCNT) . These bolometric devices are affected by the surrounding medium and are usually made in air or vacuum to improve the sensitivity. For the photo effect, the electrical signal is created based on the photoexcited exciton. Arnold et al. reported a detectivity > 1010 cm·Hz1/2/W at 400 – 1500 nm with 3 dB bandwidth of 31 MHz using a CNTs/C60 heterojunction (see Figure 9) . Lu et al. achieved a detectivity of 2.3 × 108 cm·Hz1/2/W with a P3HT/CNT heterojunction from 1000 – 1300 nm . Controlling the charity and uniformity of CNT may further improve the device performance. More details can be found in recent reviews [18, 179].
3.3 Other low-dimension materials based PDs
Besides the graphene and CNT, other low-dimensional materials have been reported with photodetection capabilities, including transition metal chalcogenide (TMDC), semiconducting nanowire, and QD.
Similar to graphene, the layered TMDCs (e.g. MoS2, GaS, WS2, GaTe, GaSe), also inherit the two-dimensional quantum limit. The exfoliated versions of TMDCs offer layer-dependent properties, which are complementary to yet distinct from those in graphene . For example, TMDCs generally undergo an indirect- to directband gap transformation with decreasing layer numbers, which is essentially a result of quantum confinement and change in the atomic orbital hybridization . Such band gap shift leads to the changes in the photoconductivity. Moreover, excitons are created in TMDCs due to the 2D quantum confinement and band splitting, which changes the absorption spectra . TMDC-based PDs have been demonstrated in the literature using photovoltaic or photo-thermoelectric mechanism [201, 202]. However, the band gaps of most TMDC range from 1.1 – 1.9 eV (< 1130 nm) , which are not suitable for telecommunication applications. More details about TMDC PDs can be found in Ref. [198, 204].
Semiconducting nanowires such as Si, InGaN, InP, CdS etc, or “nanowhisker” were invented in 1990s , and have been actively investigated for photonic applications . Similar to CNT, the optical and electronic properties of nanowires can be controlled by adjusting the sizes, dimensions, elementary compositions and morphology, for example, InGaN nanowire has a tunable band gap from UV to near infrared . The large surface to volume ratio and high density of surface states enable photodetection with high sensitivity . So far, nanowire PDs in various configurations (e.g. ohmic contact, Schottky contact, p-n dipole, APD, core-shell nanowire, etc) with the responsivity > 3000 A/W have been achieved . Despite the excellent photodetection performance, the band gaps of semiconducting nanowires are usually larger than 1 eV [208, 210]. Therefore, the nanowire PDs are frequently operating in UV-visible region instead of infrared telecommunication region. Readers may refer to Ref. [209, 211] for more details.
QDs (e.g. InAs, GaAs, PbS, PbSe, CdSe etc) are the zero-dimensional nanostructures that can be synthesized from the solution phase, which can even outperform the epitaxial counterparts. Benefitting from the quantum confinement, the band gap and band offset of the QD depends highly on the size, shape and composition of the nanocrystal, offering a great tunability from visible to even long wavelength infrared regime [212, 213]. Meanwhile, the confinement makes the charge carriers of the QD occupy discrete energy levels and experience many quantum effects such as delocalization, variable range hopping and slow carrier relaxation . Multiexciton generation with long exciton lifetime is also found to be significant in the QD that can be exploited to improve the photodetection performance [215–217]. QD PDs operating in telecommunication wavelength region have been established with either photodiode structures with fast responses [218–220], or photoconductor structures with high responsivity [221, 222]. The maximum responsivity can be larger than 2700 A/W with a dark current ∼0.7 mA/cm2 at 100 V bias for PdS QDs . However, the main trade-off of QD PDs is the relatively small bandwidth (typically megahertz) due to its size-confinement. More detailed review on QD PDs can be found in Ref. [213, 214, 223].
4 Plasmonic PDs
One of the challenges for the integration of optics and electronics is that the dimension of optics (in micrometers) is significantly larger than the size of electronics (in nanometers). This incompatibility often leads to substantial penalties in power dissipation, area, and latency in PDs. Smaller active regions can be designed for PDs. However, this will result in low responsivity because of the short effective absorption length. Here, surface plasmon polaritons, the collective oscillations of electrons at the surface of metals, would be able to enhance and focus electromagnetic waves to improve the performance of the PDs with small active regions [20, 21, 224, 225].
4.1 Plasmons excited by electrodes
Waveguide PDs are common devices to convert optical to electronic signals by coupling light from waveguides to semiconductors. To increase speed and reduce footprint, its sensitivity needs to be enhanced. Plasmonic resonances have been studied to improve the performance of the waveguide PDs. The most direct approach is to exploit the electrodes of the PDs to excite surface plasmon resonance. Ren et al. have introduced plasmons by adding thin Al interdigitated electrodes on top of a Ge-based PD (Figure 10) . The plasmons generated by the Al electrodes considerably enhanced the coupling of light from the silicon waveguide into the PD, enabling the use of smaller devices and hence higher speed. The resulting strong field intensities permeates the Ge active region, enabling high absorption under TM-mode injection. Measured results showed the TM-mode photocurrent is three times more than the TE mode that did not have plasmonic enhancement. The responsivity was measured to be 1.081 A/W at 1550 nm.
Plasmonics has also been used to enhance the performance of the Si waveguide IPE PDs (see Section 2.3), which normally consist of a metal-semiconductor interface where the Schottky barrier is formed. Plasmonic resonances can dramatically enhance the electromagnetic fields near the metal surface and increase its total absorption, resulting in an increased photocurrent. Levy et al. experimentally demonstrated an on-chip nanoscale silicon surface-plasmon IPE PD operating at the telecommunica-
tions wavelength (Figure 11(a)) . The fabricated PDs showed enhanced detection capability for shorter wavelengths that is attributed to the increased probability of the internal photoemission (IPE) process enhanced by the plasmon resonance. The responsivity of 13.3 mA/W has been measured at 1310 nm. In addition, the PD can be easily integrated with other Si photonic components. Halas et al. reported an active optical PD consisting of an array of independent rectangular gold nanorods (Figure 11(b)), which supported both longitudinal and transverse plasmon resonances , creating hot electron-hole pairs for photocurrents. The experiment measured photocurrent responsivity up to 9 μA/W at the telecommunications wavelength with the nanoantenna dimension of 50 nm (W) × 30 nm (T) × 158 nm (L).
4.2 Plasmonic antenna-based PDs
Optical antennas are key devices in the focusing of light from free space or waveguides into ultra-small, nanometer-scale volumes. Plasmonic antennas have recently been used to enhance the performance of the PDs.
Typically, the antennas are placed close to the active region of the PDs to confine optical near fields into a subwavelength volume . Subwavelength MSM PDs using a plasmonic dipole antenna have been demonstrated as shown in Figure 12. The gold dipole antenna was used to collect and concentrate light into a subwavelength germanium nanowire between the two dipole arms. The detector active region has an ultra-small volume of 150 nm × 60 nm × 80 nm, on the order of 10–4 of the operating wavelength at 1310 – 1480 nm, much smaller than the traditional semiconductor PDs. An enhancement by a factor of 20 in the photocurrent has been achieved due to the plasmonic antenna resonance.
This concept was extended to plasmonic waveguide PDs, which could be a promising component for the nextgeneration chip-scale integration as it can both confine and guide optical signals in subwavelength structures. Placing a dipole antenna at the end of a metal–insulator–metal (MIM) waveguide allows effective coupling of the optical power from the waveguide to the antenna. The electromagnetic fields in the gap between two antenna
arms can be enhanced more than 100 times . By filling semiconductor materials (e.g. Si, GaAs, Ge, etc) in the gap, a high performance PD can be easily built. Figure 13 shows a plasmonic MIM waveguide and a MSM PD consisting of a dipole antenna formed by two L-shaped metallic nanorods . The L-shaped nanorods function as both a dipole nanoantenna and a half-wavelength nanocavity to efficiently couple and confine the electromagnetic fields from the plasmonic waveguide. This detector has a very small active volume (50 × 50 × 50 nm), and hence a small footprint and potentially THz detection speed . However, optical power coupling is not entirely efficient due to power leakage arising from the gap in between the dipole antenna and the end of the MIM waveguide.
Among all plasmonic waveguides, hybrid plasmonic waveguides are the most suitable in intra-chip optic data transmission due to its excellent confinement and relatively low propagation loss [228–230]. The hybrid waveguide consists of a metal–insulator–semiconductor structure, which supports the design of a monopole antenna, which is more efficient than the dipole antenna configuration. The monopole is essentially a half-dipole mounted on a ground plane. If the ground plane is large enough, the electromagnetic waves reflected from it will seem to come from an image antenna that forms the missing half of the dipole. Figure 14(a) shows a hybrid plasmonic waveguide PD consisting of a monopole antenna . The waveguide
is formed by sandwiching a thin layer of silica between an aluminum slab and a silicon nanowire. The metallic part of the waveguide serves as the conducting ground of the monopole antenna. The antenna feed can thus be placed at the terminal and subsequently the monopole antenna on top of it to form a nanocavity or the active volume of the PD. Simulation results show that 42% of optical power is absorbed in the active volume with dimensions 150 (L) × 60 (W) × 220 nm (H), which is fairly lager than the 27% power absorption with a dipole antenna . Figure 14(b)– 14(c) shows the power flow intensity inside the waveguide and the nanocavity of the PDs with both the monopole and dipole antennas, respectively. The optical coupling was further improved using coupled cavities, and 78% absorption efficiency was achieved . In addition, the monopole antenna is easier to fabricate compared to the dipole antenna, owing to the former’s gapless and monolithic built.
4.3 Photodetectors without semiconductor
Unlike most PDs relying on semiconductors, plasmons could provide a direct conversion between photons and electrons, and thus plasmonic PDs could be built without using semiconductors. Melosh et al. have designed a purely plasmonic PD by using surface plasmon excitations in a simple MIM structure similar to a rectenna as shown in Figure 15(a) . When light illuminates the top of the MIM structure, plasmons excited on the topmost metal layer can create a high concentration of hot electrons. If these hot electrons have enough energy, they can tunnel through the thin insulating barrier to produce photocurrents. Without plasmon excitation, the efficiency of this hot carrier tunneling is low and cannot be considered for photodetection.
When the MIM structure is replaced by a nanoparticle dimer separated by a subnanometer gap, charge transfer plasmon (CTP) could be excited [235–241]. The CTP has opened up new opportunities in nanoscale optoelectronics, single-molecule sensing and nonlinear optics . Quantum mechanical effects become important when the two nanoparticles are placed so closely that electrons can tunnel across the gap. Theoretical studies showed that the CTP can be excited when the vacuum gap is in the scale of 0.3 – 0.5 nm [237, 238]. Recently, the CTP has also been experimentally observed at a large gap up to 1.3 nm, with a self-assembled molecular layer filling the gap as shown in Figure 15(b) . The measured and simulated results showed that the frequency of the tunneling currents is approximately 200 THz and can be tuned by changing the molecules. This technology can be directly used for ultra-high speed PDs . This is revolutionary considering that traditional semiconductor optoelectronic detectors can only operate in frequencies limited to tens of GHz. As these PDs also have nanometer footprints, they are promising PDs for next-generation optoelectronic circuits, with operation speeds over tens of thousands times higher than our familiar microprocessors.
The performance of PDs depends on the material systems and structures adopted. Table 1 summarizes the performances of typical PDs made from various material platforms. The performance is characterized in terms of responsivity, bandwidth, and dark currents. Two sample PDs were selected to represent each structure. As complementary to Table 1, Table 2 compares the performances
of various PDs based on the types of the photodetection structures, so as to offer the readers a different angle of perspective. Note that the bandwidth in Table 1 and Table 2 represents the gain-bandwidth product for APD structures and 3dB bandwidth for other PDs. For detailed information on the historical evolution of a particular material system, readers can refer to other review articles: Ref. [10, 24] for the InGaAs PDs, Ref. [7, 103] for the all-Si PDs, Ref. [2, 62] for the Ge PDs, Ref. [10, 141] for the HgCdTe PDs, Ref. [14, 148] for the graphene PDs, Ref. [18, 179] for the CNT PDs, Ref. [198, 204, 209, 211, 213, 214] for other low-dimensional materials PDs, and Ref. [22, 242] for the plasmonic PDs.
In 1–x GaxAs system: At present, it is the most promising and commercialized material system for photodetection at the telecommunications wavelength. Its tunable band gap from 850 to 3600 nm makes it suitable for a wide range of photodetection applications. Furthermore, InGaAs has a nearly inexistent lattice mismatch with the InP substrate, which results in its very good performance. To date, high responsivities of > 1 A/W , large bandwidths up to 100 GHz [48, 59], high quantum efficiencies of > 90% [34, 47], high speeds of ∼50 Gb/s [60, 61], and low dark currents of < 10 pA [34, 59] have been demonstrated based on the InGaAs system. There is no other material currently better than InGaAs in terms of the photodetection performance.
However, InGaAs faces two limitations: (1) Integrated optoelectronic circuits require chip-integration of light sources, modulators, PDs and other Si devices. However, the 8.1% lattice mismatch between InP and Si makes InGaAs PDs difficult to be integrated with other CMOS circuits. (2) According to Moore’s law, future transistor sizes will keep on shrinking to the nanometer scale. In such small dimensions, the performance of conventional semiconductor PDs (e.g. InGaAs, Ge, Si, and HgCdTe) will be severely degraded due to the reduction of the active area. The limitations come from its fundamental material properties and thus are unavoidable. To maintain high speed, large bandwidth and small signal noise at nanometer scale, plasmonic and graphene PDs would be much more promising.
Ge-on-Si system: With the development of the epitaxy growth techniques, Ge is becoming a very competitive semiconductor material for photodetection in communications applications. Compared with InGaAs, Ge has a relatively smaller lattice mismatch with Si substrate (∼4.2%) , which enables Ge to be directly grown on the Si substrate, resolving the compatibility issue with the CMOS circuits. Based on this fact, Ge is slated to replace InGaAs in the development of low cost Si-based optical device. At the current stage, Ge-on-Si PDs have shown comparable performance to the InGaAs PDs. High responsivity of ∼1.76 A/W at an input voltage 5 V , modest bandwidth of > 30 GHz , high QE of ∼90% , high speed of ∼43 Gb/s, small bit-error-rate of < 10–12, and low dark currents of ∼0.2 pA  are reported in literature.
All-Si systems: The potential of all-Si PD relies on its perfect compatibility with other CMOS components. However, the large band gap of Si limits its photodetection wavelength spectrum to below 1100 nm . Techniques such as doping or surface engineering to manipulate the band structure of Si are required to enable sub-band gap photon absorption. Currently, only the all-Si mid-band gap absorption (MBA) PD structure shows comparable performance with the commercialized InGaAs PDs. High responsivity of ∼ 0.5 – 10 A/W at high input voltage ∼60 V, modest bandwidth of > 35 GHz , and low bit-error-rate of < 10–12 have been reported. Other structures such as surface state absorption (SSA), IPE, or TPA PDs are still limited by low responsivity and QE .
HgCdTe system: The distinguishing advantage of HgCdTe over other semiconductors is in its tunable band gap from 0.7 to 25 μm, and having high lattice matching with the CdTe substrate . The HgCdTe avalanche PD structure has an extremely small ionization ratio k ∼0.1, leading to high responsivities of > 13 A/W, high quantum efficiencies of > 90%, low dark currents of < 60 nA and large gains of > 100 . However, HgCdTe is very difficult to integrate with CMOS circuits due to the 19% lattice mismatch between CdTe and Si. Furthermore, the toxic nature of Hg raises serious safety issues during the fabrication.
Graphene system: Graphene is a 2D atomically-thin film that holds the potential for future generation photodetection devices. Graphene’s unique gapless band structure and ultrafast carrier mobility enables it to outperform other semiconductor materials for optical communications applications. Additionally, graphene has very good compatibility with Si substrate, and thus can be directly integrated with CMOS circuits [149, 151]. So far, a bandwidth of 40 Gb/s , and sensitivity of 107 A/W  have been separately demonstrated in laboratories for the graphene PDs. The challenge remains to increase the responsivity without sacrificing the bandwidth and effective detection area. Improvement in the fabrication process for mass production is another issue to address before commercialization.
CNT system: CNT is a 1D structure whose properties strongly depend on its size and dimension. The band gap of the CNT (0.2 – 1.5 eV) is inversely proportional to its diameter, making the CNT capable of photodetection in a wide spectral range . Due to the quantum confinement, excitons instead of free carriers are effectively generated under photoexcitation. The exciton can undergo multiplication to further improve the photodetection sensitivity and response speed . A responsivity of 0.9 – 1.8 A/W has been demonstrated from visible to near-infrared for a CNT bolometric p-n diode . However, the bandwidth of the CNT PD is usually limited within megahertz, hindering its application in telecommunication.
Other low-dimensional materials systems: Layered TMDC, nanowire, and QD have also demonstrated tunable band gaps and might be used as PDs. TMDC and nanowire generally possess large band gap > 1 eV [204, 209], hence are not suitable for telecommunication applications. The QD can absorb photons from visible to far-infrared regime owing to its size-dependent band gap . The responsivity of the QD photoconductor can achieve 2700 A/W from visible to 1300 nm . However, the bandwidth of the QD PD is quite small and the dark current is relatively high. To fulfill the requirement of telecommunication applications, implementing hybrid structures consisting of QD and other materials (e.g. graphene) might be a possible solution .
Plasmonic PDs: Surface plasmons enhance and focus electromagnetic waves in the vicinity of a metallic structure. This allows for the design of small active regions in the PDs without compromising the absorption efficiency. The electrodes of the PDs can be simply designed to excite the surface plasmons and enhance the performance of the PDs. To maximize the enhancement, the electrodes can be further designed to be plasmonic antennas which concentrate light to a subwavelength volume. Plasmonic antenna-based PDs can achieve an active region on the order of 10–4 of the operating wavelength, much smaller than that of traditional semiconductor PDs. More importantly, it is possible to directly convert light into electronic current using plasmons without the need for semiconductor materials. CTPs in a metal–insulator–metal structure is shown to have tunneling current frequencies reaching 200 THz , as such, CTP-based PDs could potentially have a nanometer footprint with THz operating speeds. This is revolutionary, considering that the traditional semiconductor PDs could only operate with speeds of up to tens of GHz.
6 Conclusions and Perspectives
In conclusion, InGaAs and Ge are currently the most mature platforms for photodetection and will dominate communications applications for a period of time. All-Si PD research will still be focusing on improving the device performance (sensitivity, speed, bandwidth, etc) to enable suitability for high-performance communications applications. HgCdTe PD is more suitable for infrared imaging instead of telecommunication. PDs based on lowdimensional materials (e.g. graphene, CNT, QD, etc) and plasmonics are still in their infancy but have shown potential in the development of nanoscale high-performance PDs. In the future, we speculate that low cost and highperformance PDs could eventually be materialized with the rapid progress in the research of low-dimensional materials and plasmonics.
The National Research Foundation (NRF) is kindly acknowledged for supporting this research under the CRP program (award No. NRF-CRP 8-2011-07).
Jalali B., Paniccia M., Reed G., Silicon photonics, IEEE Microw. Mag. 2006, 7, 58-68.Google Scholar
Wang J., Lee S.J., Ge-Photodetectors for Si-Based Optoelectronic Integration, Sensors. 2011, 11, 696-718.Google Scholar
Pavesi L., Guillot G., Optical Interconnects: The Silicon Approach (Springer Series in Optical Sciences), New York: Springer 2006.Google Scholar
Keiser G., Optical Fiber Communications, Encyclopedia of Telecommunications, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.Google Scholar
Jalali B., Yegnanarayanan S., Yoon T., Yoshimoto T., Rendina I., Coppinger F., Advances in silicon-on-insulator optoelectronics, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 1998, 4, 938-947.Google Scholar
Schaub J.D., Li R., Csutak S.M., Campbell J.C., High-speed monolithic silicon photoreceivers on high resistivity and SOI substrates, J. Lightw. Tech. 2001, 19, 272-278.Google Scholar
Casalino M., Near-Infrared Sub-Bandgap All-Silicon Photodetectors: A Review, International Journal of Optics and Applications, 2012, 2, 1-16.Google Scholar
Baker R.J., CMOS: Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, 3rd ed. John Wiley& Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2011.Google Scholar
Wanlass F.M., View M., Calif., Low Stand-by power complementary field effect circuitry, US patent 3, 356, 858, 1963.Google Scholar
Rogalski A., Infrared detectors: status and trends, Prog. Quant. Electron. 2003, 27, 59-210.Google Scholar
Libertino S., Coffa S., Benton J.L., Halliburton K., Eaglesham D.J., Formation, evolution and annihilation of interstitial clusters in ion-implanted Si, Phys. Rev. B 2001, 63, 195206:1-14.Google Scholar
Liu Y., Forrest S.R., Hladky J., Lange M.J., Olsen G.H., Ackley D.E., A planar InP/InGaAs avalanche photodiode with floating guard ring and double diffused junction, IEEE J. Lightw. Technol. 1992, 10, 182-193.Google Scholar
Elliott C.T., Day D., Wilson B.J., An integrating detector for serial scan thermal imaging, Infrared Phys. 1982, 22, 31-42.Google Scholar
Bonaccorso F., Sun Z., Hasan T., Ferrari A.C., Graphene photonics and optoelectronics, Nat. Photon. 2010, 4, 611-622.Google Scholar
Castro Neto A.H., Guinea F., Peres N.M.R., Novoselov K.S., Geim A.K., The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys. 2009, 81, 109-162.Google Scholar
Bachino S.M., Strano M.S., Kittrel C., Hauge R.H., Smalley R.E., Weisman R.B., Structure-Assigned optical spectra single-walled carbon nanotubes, Science 2002, 298, 2361-2366.Google Scholar
Wang F., Dukovic G., Brus L.E., Heinz T.F., The optical resonances in carbon nanotubes arise from excitons, Science 2005, 308, 838-841.Google Scholar
Avouris P., Freitag M., Perebeinos V., Carbon-nanotube photonics and optoelectronics, Nat. Photon. 2008, 2, 341-350.Google Scholar
Kang Y.K., Liu H.D., Morse M., Paniccia M.J., Zadka M., Litski S., Sarid G., Pauchard A., Kuo Y.H., Chen H.W., Zaoui W.S., Bowers J.E., Beling A., McIntosh D.C., Zheng X.H., Campell J.C., Monolithic germanium/silicon avalanche photodiodes with 340 GHz gain-bandwidth product, Nat. Photon. 2009, 3, 59-63.Google Scholar
Ren F.F., Ang K.W., Song J.F., Fang Q., Yu M.B., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., Surface plasmon enhanced responsivity in a waveguided germanium metal-semiconductor-metal photodetector, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 97, 091102.Google Scholar
Goykhman I., Desiatov B., Khurgin J., Shappir J., Levy U., Locally Oxidized Silicon Surface-Plasmon Schottky Detector for Telecom Regime, Nano Lett. 2011, 11(6), 2219–2224.Google Scholar
Novotny L., Hulst N.V., Antennas for light, Nat. Photon. 2011, 5, 83–90.Google Scholar
Tang L., Kocabas S.E., Latif S., Okyay A.K., Ly-Gagnon D.S., Saraswat K.C., Miller D.A.B., Nanometre-scale germanium photodetector enhanced by a near-infrared dipole antenna, Nat. Photon. 2008, 2, 226–229.Google Scholar
Kaniewski J., Piotrowski J., InGaAs for infrared photodetectors, Physics and technology, Opto-electron. Rev. 2004, 12, 139-148.Google Scholar
Olsen G.H., Cohen M.J., Applications of near-infrared imaging, Proc. SPIE 1998, 3379, 300-306.Google Scholar
Olsen G.H., Lange M.J., Cohen M.J., Kim D.S., Forrest S.R., Threeband 1.0-2.5 um near-infrared InGaAs detector array, Proc. SPIE 1994, 2235, 151-159.Google Scholar
Gyuro I., MOVPE for InP-based optoelectronic device application, III-Vs Rev. 1996, 9, 30-35.Google Scholar
Roelkens G., Brouckaert J., Thourhout D.V., Baets R., Notzel R., Smit M., Integration of InP/InGaAsP photodetectors onto silicon-on-insulator waveguide circuits, Opt. Express 2005, 13, 10102-10108.Google Scholar
Roelkens G., Thourhout D.V., Baets R., Notzel R., Smit M., Laser emission and photodetection in an InP/InGaAsP layer integrated on and coupled to a silicon-on-insulator waveguide circuit, Opt. Express 2006, 14, 8184-8159.Google Scholar
Periner E., Guttzeit A., Wehmann H.H., The effect of threading dislocations on optical absorption and electron scattering in strongly mismatched heteroepitaxial III-V compound semiconductors on silicon, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14, 13195-13201.Google Scholar
Sun Y.T., Baskar K., Lourdudoss S., Thermal strain in indium phosphide on silicon obtained by epitaxial lateral growth, J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 2746-2748.Google Scholar
Mi Z., Yang J., Bhattacharya P., Chan P.K.L., Pipe K.P., High Performance self-organized In(Ga)As quantum dot lasers monolithically grown on silicon, Proc. SPIE 2006, 6125, 612506.Google Scholar
Seo S.W., Cho S.Y., Huang S., Shin J.J., Jokerst N.M., Brown A.S., Brooke M.A., High-speed large area inverted InGaAs thin-film metal-semiconductor-metal photodetector, IEEE J. Sel. Topics Quantum Electron. 2004, 10, 686-693.Google Scholar
Sheng Z., Liu L., Brouckaert J., He S., Throurhout D.V., InGaAs PIN photodetectors integrated on silicon-on-insulator waveguide, Opts. Express 2010, 18, 1756-1761.Google Scholar
Brouckaert J., Roelkens G., Thourhout D.V., Baets R., Thin-film III-V photodetectors integrated on silicon-on-insulator photonic ICs, J. Lightw. Technol. 2007, 25, 1053-1060.Google Scholar
Maruyama T., Okumura T., Arai S., Direct wafer bonding of GaInAsP/InP membrane structure on silicon-on-insulator substrate, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 45, 8717-8718.Google Scholar
Roelkens G., Brouckaert J., Thourhout D.V., Baets R., Notzel R., Smit M., Adhesive Bonding of InP/InGaAsP dies to process silicon-on-insulator wafers using DVS-bis-benzocyclobutene, J. Electronchem. Soc. 2006, 153, G1015-G1019.Google Scholar
Feng S.Q., Geng Y., Lau K.M., Poon A.W., Epitaxial III-V-on-silicon waveguide butt-coupled photodetectors, Optics Letters 2002, 37, 4035-4037.Google Scholar
Effenberger F.J., Joshi A.M., Ultrafast, Dual-Depletion Region, InGaAs/InP p-i-n detector, J. Lightw. Technol. 1996, 14, 1859-1864.Google Scholar
Dentai A.G., Kuchibhotla R., Campbell J.C., Tsai C., Lei C., High quantum efficiency long-wavelength InP/InGaAs microcavity photodiode, Electron. Lett. 1991, 27, 2125-2127.Google Scholar
Kjellman J.O., Sugiyama M., Nakano Y., Near-infrared electroluminescence and photo detection in InGaAs p-i-n microdisks grown by selective area growth on silicon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 104, 241103-241105.Google Scholar
Julian B.D., Schumacher H., InGaAs Metal-Semiconductor-Metal Photodetectors for Long wavelength Optical Communications, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1991, 27, 737-752.Google Scholar
Schumacher H., LeBlanc H.P., Scoole J., Bhat R., An investigation of the optoelectronic response of GaAs/InGaAs MSM photodetectors, IEEE Electron. Devices Lett. 1988, 9, 607-609.Google Scholar
Kikuchi T., Ohno H., Hasegawa H., In0.53Ga0.47As metalsemiconductor-metal photodiodes using a lattice mismatched AlGaAs Schottky assist layer, Electron. Lett. 1988, 24, 1208-1210.Google Scholar
Scoole J.B.D., Schumacher H., LeBlanc H.P., Bhat R., Koza M.A., High-speed performance of OMCVD grown InAlAs/InGaAs MSM photodetectors at 1.5 μm and 1.3 μm wavelengths, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1989, 1, 250-252.Google Scholar
Griem H.T., Ray S., Freeman J.L., West D.L., Long-wavelength (1.0-1.6 μm) In0.52Al0.48As/In0.53(GaxAl1–x)0.47As/In0.53Ga0.47As metalsemiconductor-metal photodetector, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 56, 1067-1068.Google Scholar
Kim J.H., Griem H.T., Friedman R.A., Chan E.Y., Ray S., Highperformance back-illuminated InGaAs/InAlAs MSM photodetector with a record responsivity of 0.96A/W, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1992, 4, 1241-1244.Google Scholar
Onat B.M., Gokkavas M., Ozbay E., Ata E.P., Towe E., Unlu M.S., 100-GHz resonant cavity enhanced Schottky photodiodes, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1998, 10, 707-709.Google Scholar
Ohira K., Kobayashi K., Iizuka N., Yoshida H., Ezaki M., Uemura H., Kojima A., Nakamura K., Furuyama H., Shibata H., On-chip optical interconnection by using integrated III-V laser diode and photodetector with silicon waveguide, Opt. Express 2010, 18, 15440-15447.Google Scholar
Cheng Y.P., Ikku Y., Takenaka M., Takagi S., InGaAs MSM photodetector monolithically integrated with InP photonic-wire waveguide on III-V CMOS, IEICE Electronic Express 2014, 11, 1-8.Google Scholar
Othman M.A., Taib S.N., Husain M.N., Napiah Z.A.F.M., Reviews on avalanche photodiode for optical communication technology, APRN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 2014, 9, 35-44.Google Scholar
Biber A., Seitz P., Jackel H., Avalanche Photodiode image Sensor in Standard BiCMOS Technology, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2000, 47, 2241-2243.Google Scholar
Campbell J.C., Recent Advances in Telecommunications Avalanche Photodiodes, J. Lightw. Technol. 2007, 25, 109-121.Google Scholar
Hyun K.S., Paek Y., Kwon Y.H., Yun I., Lee E.H., High Speed and High Reliability InP/InGaAs Avalanche Photodiode for Optical Communications, Proc. SPIE. 2003, 130-137.Google Scholar
Kuchigbotla R., Campell J.C., Tsai C., Tsang W.T., Choa F.S., Delta-doped SAGM avalanche photodiodes, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 1991, 38, 2705-2706.Google Scholar
Watanabe I., Sugou S., Ishikawa H., Anan T., Makita K., Tsuji M., Taguchi K., High-speed and low-darkcurrent flip-chip InAlAs/InAlGaAs quaternary well superlattice APDs with 120 GHz gain-bandwidth product, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 1993, 5, 675-677.Google Scholar
Ackley D.E., Hladky J., Lange M.J., Mason S., Erickson G., Olsen G.H., Ban V.S., Liu Y., Forrest S.R., InGaAs/InP floating guard ring avalanche photodiodes fabricated by double diffusion, IEEE Photo. Technol. Lett. 1990, 2, 571-573.Google Scholar
Huang J., Banerjee K., Ghosh S., Hayat M.M., Dual-carrier High-Gain Low-noise Superlattice Avalanche Photodiodes, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 2296-2302.Google Scholar
Tarof L.E., Knight D.G., Fox K.E., Miner C.J., Puetz N., Kim H.B., Planar InP/InGaAs avalanche photodetectors with partial charge sheet in device periphery, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1990, 57, 670-672.Google Scholar
Nada M., Yokoyama H., Muramoto Y., Ishibashi T., Matsuzaki H., 50-Gbit/s vertical illumination avalanche photodiode for 400-Gbit/s Ethernet systems, Opt. Express 2014, 22, 14681-14687.Google Scholar
Valivarthi R., Lucio-Martinez I., Rubenok A., Chan P., Marsili F., Verma V.B., Shaw M.D., Stern J.A., Slater J.A., Oblak D., Nam S.W., Tittel W., Efficient Bell state analyzer for time-bin qubits with fast-recovery Wsi superconducting single photon detectors, Opt. Express 2014, 22, 24497-24506.Google Scholar
Michel J., Liu J.F., Kimerling L.C., High-performance Ge-on-Si Photodetectors, Nat. Photon. 2010, 4, 527-534.Google Scholar
Luryi S., Kastalsky A., Bean J.C., New infrared detector on a silicon chip, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 1984, ED-31, 1135–1139.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald E.A., Dislocations in strained-layer epitaxy — theory, experiment, and applications, Mater. Sci. Rep. 1991, 7, 87–140.Google Scholar
Samavedam S.B., Currie M.T., Langdo T.A., Fitzgerald E.A., High-quality germanium photodiodes integrated on silicon substrates using optimized relaxed graded buffers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 2125–2127.Google Scholar
Isaacson D.M., Dohrman C.L., Fitzgerald E.A., Deviations from ideal nucleation-limited relaxation in high-Ge content compositionally graded SiGe/Si, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 2006, 24, 2741–2747.Google Scholar
Baribeau J.M., Jackman T.E., Houghton D.C., Maigne P., Denhoff M.W., Growth and characterization of Si1–xGex and Ge epilayers on (100) Si, J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 63, 5738–5746.Google Scholar
Luan H.C., Lim D.R., Lee K.K., Chen K.M., Sandland J.G., Wada K., Kimerling L.C., High-quality Ge epilayers on Si with low threading dislocation densities, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1999, 75, 2909–2911.Google Scholar
Ishikawa Y., Wada K., Cannon D.D., Liu J.F., Luan H.C., Kimerling L.C., Strain-induced band gap shrinkage in Ge grown on Sisubstrate, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 2044–2046.Google Scholar
Liu J.F., Cannon D.D., Wada K., Ishikawa Y., Danielson D.T., Jongthammanurak S., Michel J., Kimerling L.C., Deformation potential constants of biaxially tensile stressed Ge epitaxial films on Si(100), Phys. Rev B 2004, 70, 155309.Google Scholar
Liu J.F., Cannon D.D., Wada K., Ishikawa Y., Jongthammanurak S., Danielson D.T., Michel J., Kimerling L.C., Tensile strained Ge p-i-n photodetectors on Si platform for C and L band telecommunications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 011110.Google Scholar
Fang Y.Y., Tolle J., Roucka R., Chizmeshya A.V.G., Kouvetakis J., Dcosta V.R., Menendez J., Perfectly tetragonal, tensile-strained Ge on Ge1–ySny buffered Si(100), Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 061915.Google Scholar
Takeuchi S., Shimura Y., Nakatsuka O., Zaima S., Ogawa M., Sakai A., Growth of highly strain-relaxed Ge1–xSnx/virtual Ge by a Sn precipitation controlled compositionally step-graded method, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 231916.Google Scholar
Nayfeh A., Chui C.O., Saraswat K.C., Yonehara T., Effects of hydrogenannealing on heteroepitaxial-Ge layers on Si: Surface roughness and electrical quality, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 2815–2817.Google Scholar
Huang Z.H., Oh J., Campbell J.C., Back-side-illuminated highspeed Ge photodetector fabricated on Si substrate using thin SiGe buff erlayers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 85, 3286–3288.Google Scholar
Osmond J., Isella G., Kaufmann R., Acciarri M., Kanel H.V., Ultralow dark current Ge/Si(100) photodiodes with low thermal budget, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 201106.Google Scholar
Liu J.F., Michel J., Giziewicz W., Pan D., Wada K., Cannon D.D., Jongthammanurak S., Danielson D.T., Kimerling L.C., Chen J., Ilday F.O., Kartner F.C., Yasaitis J., High-performance, tensilestrained Ge p-i-n photodetectors on a Si platform, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 103501.Google Scholar
Dosunmu O.I., Cannon D.D., Emsley M.K., Kimerling L.C., Unlu M.S., High speed resonant cavity enhanced Ge photodetectors on reflecting Si substrates for 1550 nm operation, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2005, 17, 175-177.Google Scholar
Ahn D., Hong C.Y., Liu J.F., Giziewicz W., Beals M., Kimerling L.C., Michel J., Chen J., Kartner F.X., High performance, waveguide integrated Ge photodetectors, Opt. Express 2007, 15, 3916-3921.Google Scholar
Feng D., Liao S.R., Dong P., Feng N.N., Liang H., Zheng D.W., Kung C.C., Fong J., Shafiiha R., Cunningham J., Krishnamoorthy A.V., Asghari M., High-speed Ge photodetector monolithically integrated with large cross-section silicon-on-insulator waveguide, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 261105.Google Scholar
Vivien L., Osmond J., Fedeli J.M., Marris-Morini D., Crozat P., Damlencourt J.F., Cassan E., Lecunff Y., Laval S., 42 GHz p.i.n germanium photodetector integrated in a silicon-on-insulator waveguide, 2009, 17, 6252-6257.Google Scholar
Beals M., Michel J., Liu J.F., Ahn D.H., Sparacin D., Sun R., Hong C.Y., Kimerling L.C., Pomerene A., Carothers D., Beattie J., Kopa A., Apsel A., Rasra M.S., Gill D.M., Patel S.S., Tu K.Y., Chen Y.K., White A.E., Process flow innovations for photonic device integration in CMOS, Proc. SPIE. 2008, 6898, 689804.Google Scholar
Zhang D.L., Xue C.L., Cheng B.W., Su S.J., Liu Z., Zhang X., Zhang G.Z., Li C.B., Wang Q.M., High-responsivity GeSn short-wave infrared p-i-n photodetectors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 102, 141111.Google Scholar
Tseng H.H., Li H., Mashanov V., Yang Y.J., Cheng H.H., Chang G.E., Soref R.A., Sun G., GeSn-based p-i-n photodiodes with strained active layer on a Si wafer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103, 231907.Google Scholar
Rouviere M., Vivien L., Roux Le X., Mangeney J., Crozat P., Hoarau C., Cassan E., Pascal D., Laval S., Fedeli J.M., Damlencourt J.F., Hartmann J.M., Kolev S., Ultrahigh speed germanium-onsilicon-on-insulator photodetectors for 1.31 and 1.55 μm operation, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 87, 231109.Google Scholar
Oh J., Banerjee S.K., Campell J.C., Metal-germanium-metal photodetectors on heteroepitaxial Ge-on-Si with amorphous Ge Schottky barrier enhancement layers, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2004, 16, 581-583.Google Scholar
Laih L.H., Chang T.C., Chen Y.A., Tsay W.C., Hong J.W., Characteristics of MSM photodetectors with trench electrodes on P-type Si wafer, IEEE Trans. Electron. Device. 1998, 45, 2018-2023.Google Scholar
Ang K.W., Zhu S.Y., Wang J., Chua K.T., Yu M.B., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., Novel Silicon-Carbon (Si:C) Schottky barrier enhancement layer for dark-current suppression in Ge-on-SOI MSM photodetectors, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2008, 7, 704-707.Google Scholar
Ang K.W., Zhu S.Y., Yu M.B., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., High-Performance Waveguide Ge-on-SOI metal-semiconductor-metal photodetectors with novel silicon-carbon (Si:C) Schottky barrier enhancement layer, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2008, 29, 754-756.Google Scholar
Zhang H., Lee S.J., Loh W.Y., Wang J., Chua K.T., Yu M.B., Cho B.J., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., Dark-current suppression in metalgermanium-metal photodetectors through dopant-segregation in NiGe-Schottky barrier, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2008, 29. 161-164.Google Scholar
Ang K.W., Zhu S.Y., Wang J., Chua K.T., Yu M.B., Lo G.D., Kwong D.L., Novel NiGe MSM photodetector featuring asymmetrical Schottky barriers using sulfur co-implantation and segregation, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2008, 29, 704-707.Google Scholar
Harris N.C., Baehr J.T., Lim A.E.J., Liow T.Y., Lo G.D., Hochberg M., Noise Characterization of a waveguide-coupled MSM photodetector exceeding unity quantum efficiency, IEEE J. Lighw. Technol. 2013, 31, 23-27.Google Scholar
People R., Physics and applications of GexSi1–x/Si strainedlayer heterostructures, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2003, 22, 1696-1710.Google Scholar
Pearsall T.P., Temkin H., Bean J.C., Luryi S., Avalanche gain in GexSi1–x/Si infrared waveguide detectors, IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 2005, 7, 330-332.Google Scholar
Assefa S., Xia F.N., Vlasov Y.A., Reinventing germanium avalanche photodetector for nanophotonic on-chip optical interconnects, Nature 2010, 464, 80-84.Google Scholar
Shim J., Kang D.H., Yoo G.W., Hong S.T., Jung W.S., Kuh B.J., Lee B., Shin D., Ha K., Kim G.S., Yu H.Y., Baek J.W., Park J.H., Germanium p-i-n avalanche photodetector fabricated by point defect healing process, Opt. Lett. 2014, 39, 4204-4207.Google Scholar
Virot L., Crozat P., Fedeli J.M., Hartmann J.M., Morini D.M., Eric C., Boeuf F., Vivien L., Germanium avalanche receiver for low power interconnects, Nat. Commun. 2014, 4, 4957.Google Scholar
Kim I.G., Jang K.S., Joo J., Kim S.H., Kim S.G., Choi K.W., Oh J.H., Kim S.A., Lim G.G., High-performance photoreceivers based on vertical-illumination type Ge-on-Si photodetectors operating up to 43 Gb/s at λ ∼1550 nm, Opt. Express 2013, 21, 30716-30723.Google Scholar
Chatterjee A., Mongkolkachit P., Bhuva B., Verma A., All Si-Based Optical Interconnect for Interchip Signal Transmission, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2003, 15, 1663-1666.Google Scholar
Fan H.Y., Ramdas A.K., Infrared Absorption and Photoconductivity in Irradiated Silicon, J. Appl. Phys. 1959, 30, 1127-1134.Google Scholar
Wertheim G.K., Energy Levels in electron-bombarded silicon, Phys. Rev. 1957, 105, 1730-1736.Google Scholar
Wetheim G.K., Neutron-Bombardment Damage in Silicon, Phys. Rev. 1958, 111, 1500-1505.Google Scholar
Geis M.W., Spector S.J., Grein M.E., Schulein R.T., Yoon J.U., Lennon D.M., Wynn C.M., Palmacci S.T., Gan F., Kartner F.X., Lyszczarz T.M., All silicon infrared photodiodes: Photo response and effects of processing temperature, Opt. Express 2007, 15, 16886-16895.Google Scholar
Knights A., House A., MacNaughton R., Hopper F., Optical power monitoring function compatible with single chip integration on silicon-on-insulator, Proc. Of conference on Optical fiber Communication, Technical Digest Series 2003, 2, 705-706.Google Scholar
Knights A.P., Bradley J.D., Gou S.H., Jessop P.E., Silicon-oninsulator waveguide photodetector with self-ion-implantationengineered enhanced infrared response, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 2006, 24, 783-786.Google Scholar
Giri P.K., Mohapatra Y.N., Thermal stability of defect complexes due to high does MeV implantation in silicon, Mater. Sci. Eng. 2000, 71, 327-332.Google Scholar
Almeida V.R., Barrios C.A., Panepucci R.R., Lipson M., Foster M.A., Ouzonnov D.G., Gaeta A.L., L-optical switching on a silicon chip, Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 2867-2869.Google Scholar
Doylend J.K., Jessop P.E., Knights A.P., Silicon photonic resonator-enhanced defect-mediated photodiode for subbandgap detection, Opt. Express 2010, 18, 14671-14678.Google Scholar
Geis M.W., Spector S.J., Grein M.E., Yoon J.U., Lennon D.M., Lyszczarz T.M., Silicon waveguide infrared photodiodes with > 35 GHz bandwidth and phototransistors with 50 A/W response, Opt. Express 2009, 17, 5193-5204.Google Scholar
Grote R.R., Padmaraju K., Bergman K., 10 Gb/s Error-Free Operation of All-Silicon Ion-Implanted-Waveguide Photodiodes at 1.55 um, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 67-71.Google Scholar
Crouch C.H., Carey J.E., Shen M., Mazur E., Genin F.Y., Infrared absorption by sulfur-doped silicon formed by femtosecond laser irradiation, Appl. Phys. A 2004, 79, 1635-1641.Google Scholar
Wu C., Crouch C.H., Zhao L., Carey J.E., Younkin R., Levinson J.A., Mazur E., Farrell R.M., Gothoskar P., Karger A., Near-unity below-band gap absorption by microstructured silicon, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 1850-1852.Google Scholar
Allen F.C., Gobeli G.W., Work Function, photoelectric threshold, and surface states of atomically clean silicon, Phys. Rev. 1962, 127, 150-158.Google Scholar
Chiarotti G., Nannarone S., Chiaradia P., Optical Absorption of Surface States in Ultrahigh Vacuum Cleaved (111) Surfaces of Ge and Si. Phys. Rev. B 1971, 4, 3398-3402.Google Scholar
Chiarotti G., Del Signore G., Nannarone S., Optical Detection of Surface States on Cleaved (111) surfaces of Ge. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1968, 21, 1170-1172.Google Scholar
Baehr-Jones T., Hochberg M., Scherer A., Photodetection in silicon beyond the band edge with surface states, Opt. Express 2008, 16, 1659-1668.Google Scholar
Chen H., Luo X., Poon A.W., Cavity-enhanced photocurrent generation by 1.55 um wavelengths linear absorption in a p-i-n diode embedded silicon microring resonator, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 171111-171113.Google Scholar
Bortolani V., Calandra C., Sghedoni A., Surface states in Si. Phys. Letters A 1971, 34, 193-194.Google Scholar
Kosonocky W.F., Shallcross F.V., Villani T.S., 160 × 244 element PtSi Schottky-barrier IR-CCD image sensor, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 1985, ED-32(8), 1564.Google Scholar
Casalina M., Sirleto L., Moretti L., Della Corte F., Rendina I., Design of a silicon resonant cavity enhanced photodetector based on the internal photoemission effect at 1.55 um, J. Opts. A: Pure and applied optics 2006, 8, 909-913.Google Scholar
Casalino M., Sirleto L., Moretti L., Rendina I., A silicon compatible resonant cavity enhanced photodetector at 1.55 um, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2008, 23, 075001:1-7.Google Scholar
Elabd H., Villani T., Kosonocky W.F., Palladium-silicide Schottky-Barrier IR-CCD for SWIR applications at intermediate temperatures, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. Lett. 1982, EDL-3, 89-90.Google Scholar
Lee M.K., Chu C.H., Wang Y.H., 1.55 um and infrared-band photoresponsivity of a Schottky barrier porous silicon photodetector, Opt. Lett. 2001, 26, 160-162.Google Scholar
Casalino M., Sirleto L., Iodice M., Saffioti N., Gioffre M., Rendina I., Coppola G., Cu/p-Si Schottky barrier-based near infrared photodetector integrated with a silicon-on-insulator waveguide, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 241112-241114.Google Scholar
Zhu S., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., Low-cost and high gain silicide Schottky-barrier collector phototransistor integrated on Si waveguide for infrared detection, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 071108.Google Scholar
Zhu S., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., Low-cost and High-Speed SOI Waveguide-Based Silicide Schottky-Barrier MSM Photodetectors for Broadband Optical Communications, IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2008, 20, 1396-1398.Google Scholar
Zhu S., Yu M.B., Lo G.Q., Kwong D.L., Near-infrared waveguidebased nickel silicide Schottky-barrier photodetector for optical communications, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 92, 081103.Google Scholar
Boggess T.F., Bohnert K.M., Mansour K., Moss S.C., Boyd I.W., Smirl A.L., Simultaneous measurement of two-photon coefficient and free-carrier cross section above the bandgap of crystalline silicon, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 1986, 22, 360-368.Google Scholar
Reintjes J.F., McGroddy J.C., Indirect two-photon transition in Si at um. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973, 30, 901-903.Google Scholar
Dinu M., Quochi F., Garcia H., Third-order nonlinearities in silicon at telecom wavelengths, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 2954-2956.Google Scholar
Cowan A.R., Rieger G.W., Young J.F., Nonlinear transmission of 1.5 um pulses through single-mode silicon-on-insulator waveguide structures, Opt. Express 2004, 12, 1611-1621.Google Scholar
Liang T.K., Tsang H.K., Day I.E., Drake J., Knights A.P., Asghari M., Silicon waveguide two-photon absorption detector at 1.5 um wavelength for autocorrelation measurements, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 1323-1325.Google Scholar
Tanabe T., Nishiguchi K., Kuramochi E., Notomi M., Low power and fast elecro-optic silicon modulator with lateral p-i-n embedded photonic crystal nanocavity, Opt. Express 2009, 17, 22505-22513.Google Scholar
Chen H., Poon A.W., Two-photon absorption photocurrent in p-i-n diode embedded silicon microdisk resonantors, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 191106.Google Scholar
Kikuchi K., Highly sensitive interferometric autocor-relator using Si avalanche photodiode as two-photon absorber, IEEE Elec. Lett. 1998, 34, 123-125.Google Scholar
Kikuchi K., Optical sampling system at 1.5 μm using two photon absorption in Si avalanche photodiode, IEEE Elec. Lett. 1998, 34, 1354-1355.Google Scholar
Salem R., Murphy T.E., Polarization-insensitive cross correlation using two-photon absorption in a silicon photodiode, Opt. Lett. 2004, 29, 1524-1526.Google Scholar
Tanaka Y., Sako N., Kurokawa T., Profilometry based on twophoton absorption in a silicon avalanche photodiode, Opt. Lett. 2003, 28, 402-404.Google Scholar
Shi B., Liu X., Chen Z., Jia G., Cao K., Zhang Y., Wang S., Ren C., Zhao J., Anisotropy of photocurrent for two-photon absorption photodetector made of hemispherical silicon with (110) plane, Appl. Phys. B 2008, 93, 873-877.Google Scholar
Lawson W.D., Nielson S., Putley E.H., Young A.S., Preparation and properties of HgTe and mixed crystal of HgTe-CdTe, J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 1959, 9 325-329.Google Scholar
Norton P., HgCdTe infrared detectors, Opto-electron. Rev. 2002, 10, 159-174.Google Scholar
Scott M.W., Energy gap in Hg1–xCdxTe by optical absorption, J. Appl. Phys. 1969, 40, 4077-4081.Google Scholar
Verie C., Raymond F., Besson J., Nquyen Duy T., Bandgap spin-orbit splitting resonance effects in Hg1–xCdxTe alloys, J. Cryst. Growth. 1982, 59, 342-346.Google Scholar
Wu O.K., Rajavel R.D., deLyon T.J., Jensen J.E., Jack M.D., Kosai K., Chapman G.R., Sen S., Baumgratz B.A., MBE-grown HgCdTe multi-layer heterojunction structures for high speed low noise 1.3–1.6 μm avalanche photodetectors, J. Electron. Mater. 1997, 26, 488-492.Google Scholar
deLyon T.J., Baumgratz B.A., Chapman G.R., Gordon E., Gorwitz M.D., Hunter A.T., Jack M.D., Jensen J.E., Johnson W., Kosai K., Larsen W., Olson G.L., Walker S.B., Epitaxial growth of HgCdTe 1.55 μm avalanche photodiodes by MBE, Proceedings of SPIE 1999, 3692, 256.Google Scholar
deLyon T.J., Rajavel R.D., Jensen J.E., Wu O.K., Johnson S.M., Cockrum C.A., Venzor G.M., Heteroepitaxy of HgCdTe (112) infrared detector structures on Si (112) substrates by molecular beam epitaxy, J. Electron. Mater. 1996, 25, 1341-1346.Google Scholar
Wijewarnasuriya P.S., Zandian M., Edwall D.D., McLevige M.V., Chen C.A., Pasko J.G., Hildebrandt H., Chen A.C., Arias J.M., D’Souza A.I., Rujirawat S., Sivananthan S., MBE p-on-n Hg1xCdxTe heterostructure detectors on silicon substrates, J. Electron. Mater. 1998, 27, 546-549.Google Scholar
Koppens H.L., Mueller T., Avouris Ph., Ferrari A.C., Vitiello M.S., Polini M., Photodetectors based on graphene, other twodimensional materials and hybrid systems, Nat. Nanotechnology 2014, 9, 780-789.Google Scholar
Gan X.T., Shiue R.J., Gao Y.D., Meric I., Heinz T.F., Shepard K., Hone J., Assefa S., Englund D., Chip-integrated ultrafast graphene photodetector with high responsivity, Nat. Photon. 2013, 7, 883-887.Google Scholar
Pospischil A., Humer M., Furchi M.M., Backmann D., Guider R., Fromherz T., Mueller T., CMOS-compatible graphene photodetector covering all optical communication bands, Nat. Photon. 2013, 7, 892-896.Google Scholar
Wang X.M., Cheng Z., Xu K., Tsang H.K., Xu J., High-responsivity graphene/silicon-heterostructure waveguide photodetectors, Nat. Photon. 2013, 7, 888-891.Google Scholar
Sun Z.H., Chang H.X., Graphene and Graphene-like Two-Dimensional Materials in Photodetection: Mechanisms and Methodology, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4133-4156.Google Scholar
Nair R.R., Blake P., Grigorenko A.N., Novoselov K.S., Booth T.J., Stauber T., Peres N.M.R., Geim A.K., Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene, Science 2008, 320, 1308-1308.Google Scholar
Casiraghi C., Hartschuh A., Lidorikis E., Qian H., Harutyunyan H., Gokus T., Novoselov K.S., Ferrari A.C., Rayleigh imaging of graphene and graphene layers, Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 2711-2717.Google Scholar
Shi S.F., Xu X.D., Ralph D.C., McEuen P.L., Plasmon Resonance in individual nanogap electrodes studied using graphene nanoconstrictions as photodetectors, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1814-1818.Google Scholar
Gao W.L., Shu J., Qiu C.Y., Xu Q.F., Excitation of plasmonic waves in graphene by guided-mode resonances, ACS Nano 2012, 6, 7806-7813.Google Scholar
Gan X.T., Mak K.F., Gao Y.D., You Y.M., Hatami F., Hone J., Heinz T.F., Englund D., Strong enhancement of light-matter interaction in graphene coupled to a photonic crystal nanocavity, Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 5626-5631.Google Scholar
Grigorenko A.N., Polini M., Novoselov K.S., Graphene plasmonics, Nat. Photonics 2012, 6, 749-758.Google Scholar
Konstantatos G., Badioli M., Gaudreau L., Osmond J., Bernechea M., Arquer F.P.G.D., Gatti F., Koppens F.H.L., Hybrid graphene-quantum dot phototransistors with ultrahigh gain, Nat. Nanotechol. 2012, 7, 363-368.Google Scholar
Draf D., Molitor F., Ensslin K., Stampfer C., Jungen A., Hierold C., Wirtz L., Spatially resolved Raman spectroscopy of single- and few-layer graphene, Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 238-242.Google Scholar
Yang L., Deslippe J., Park C.H., Cohen M.L., Louie S.G., Excitonic effects on the optical response of graphene and bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 103, 186802.Google Scholar
Mak K.F., Shan J., Heinz T.F., Seeing many-body effects in single- and few-layer graphene: observation of twodimensional saddle-point excitons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 106. 046401.Google Scholar
Freitag M., Low T., Xia F.N., Avouris P., Photoconductivity of biased graphene, Nat. Photonics 2013, 7, 53-59.Google Scholar
Muller T., Xia F., Freitag M., Tsang J., Avouris P., Role contacts in graphene transistors: a scanning photocurrent study, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 79, 245430.Google Scholar
Giovannetti G., Khomyakov P.A., Brocks G., Karpan V.M., Van den Brink J., Kelly P.J., Doping graphene with metal contacts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101, 026803.Google Scholar
Lee E.J.H., Balasubramanian K., Weitz R.T., Burghard M., Kern K., Contact and edge effects in graphene devices, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 486-490.Google Scholar
Tielrooij K.J., Song J.C.W., Jensen S.A., Centeno A., Pesquera A., Zurutuza Elorza A., Bonn M., Levitov L.S., Koppens F.H.L., Photoexcitation cascade and multiple hot-carrier generation in graphene, Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 248-252.Google Scholar
Johannsen J.C., Ulstrup S., Cilento F., Crepaldi A., Zacchigna M., Cacho C., Edmond Turcu I.C., Springate E., Fromm F., Raidel C., Seyller T., Parmigiani F., Grioni M., Hofmann P., Direct view of hot carrier dynamics in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 111, 027403.Google Scholar
Song J.C.W., Rudner M.S., Marcus C.M., Levitov L.S., Hot carrier transport and photocurrent response in graphene, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4688-4692.Google Scholar
Xu X.D., Gador N.M., Alden J.S., Van der Zande A.M., McEuen P.L., Photo-thermoelectric effect at a graphene interface junction, Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 562-566.Google Scholar
Lemme M.C., Koppens F.H.L., Falk A.L., Runder M.S., Park H., Levitov L.S., Marcus C.M., Gate-activated photoresponse in a graphene p-n junction, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4134-4237.Google Scholar
Kim M.H., Yan J., Suess R.J., Murphy T.E., Fuhrer M.S., Drew H.D., Photothermal response in dual-gated bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013, 110, 247402.Google Scholar
Yan J., Kim M.H., Elle J.A., Sushkov A.B., Jenkins G.S., Milchberg H.M., Fuhrer M.S., Drew H.D., Dual-Gated Bilayer Graphene Hotelectron Bolometer, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 472-478.Google Scholar
Xia F.N., Mueller T., Lin Y.M., Garcia A.V., Avouris P., Ultrafast graphene photodetector, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 839-843.Google Scholar
Mueller T., Xia F.N., Avouris P., Graphene photodetectors for high-speed optical communications, Nat. Photon. 2010, 4, 297-301.Google Scholar
Kim C.O., Kum S., Shin D.H., Kang S.S., Kim J.M., Jang C.W., Joo S.S., Lee L.S., Kim J.H., Choi S.H., Hwang E., High photoresponsivity in an all-graphene p-n vertical junction photodetector, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 3249:1-7.Google Scholar
Liu C.H., Chang Y.C., Norris T.B., Zhong Z.H., Graphene photodetectors with ultra-broadband and high responsivity at room temperature, Nat. Commun. 2014, 9, 273-278.Google Scholar
Iijima S., Helical microtubules of graphite carbon, Nature 1991, 354, 56-58.Google Scholar
Yang L.J., Wang S., Zeng Q.S., Zhang Z.Y., Peng L.M., Carbon Nanotube photoelectronic and photovoltaic devices and their applications in infrared detection, Small 2013, 9, 1225-1236.Google Scholar
Itkis M.E., Borondics F., Yu A.P., Haddon R.C., Bolometric Infrared Photoresponse of suspended single-walled carbon nanotube films, Science 2006, 312, 413-416.Google Scholar
Koch S.W., Kira M., Khitrova G., Gibbs H.M., Semiconductor excitons in new light, Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 523-531.Google Scholar
O’Connell M.J., Bachilo S.M., Huffman C.B., Moore V.C., Strano M.S., Haroz E.H., Rialon K.L., Boul P.J., Noon W.H., Kittrell C., Ma J.P., Hauge R.H., Band gap fluorescence from individual singlewalled carbon nanotubes, Science, 2002, 297, 593-596.Google Scholar
Ando T., Excitons in carbon nanotubes, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 1997, 66, 1066-1073.Google Scholar
Burda C., Chen X.B., Narayanan R., El-Sayed M.A., Chemistry and properties of nanocrystals of different shapes, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1025-1102.Google Scholar
Scholes G.D., Rumbles G., Excitons in nanoscale systems, Nat. Mater. 2006, 5, 683-696.Google Scholar
Freitag M., Martin Y., Misewich J.A., Martel R., Avouris P.H., Photoconductivity of single carbon nanotubes, Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1067-1071.Google Scholar
Mohite A., Gopinath P., Shah H.M., Alphenaar B.W., Exciton dissociation and stark effect in the carbon nanotube photocurrent spectrum, Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 142-146.Google Scholar
Yang L.J., Wang S., Zheng Q.S., Zhang Z.Y., Pei T., Li Y., Peng L.M., Efficient photovoltage multiplication in carbon nanotubes, Nat. Photonics 2011, 5, 672-676.Google Scholar
Perebeinos V., Tersoff J., Avouris P., Scaling of excitons in carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 257402.Google Scholar
Kane C.L., Mele E.J., Electron interactions and scaling relations for optical excitons in carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 197402.Google Scholar
Gabor N.M., Zhong Z.H., Bosnick K., Park J.W., McEuen P.L., Extremely efficient multiple electron-hole pair generation in carbon nanotube photodiodes, Science 2009, 325, 1367-1371.Google Scholar
Baer R., Rabani E., Can impact excitation explain efficient carrier multiplication in carbon nanotube photodiodes?, Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 3277-3282.Google Scholar
Prechtel L., Song L., Manus S., Schuh D., Wegscheider W., Holleitner A.W., Time-resolved picosecond photocurrents in contacted carbon nanotubes, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 269-272.Google Scholar
St-Antoine, Menard D., Martel R., Single-walled carbon nanotube thermopile for broadband light detection, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 609-613.Google Scholar
Lu R.T., Shi J.J., Baca F.J., Wu J.Z., High performance multiwall carbon nanotube bolometers, J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 084305.Google Scholar
Arnold M.S., Zimmerman J.D., Renshaw C.K., Xu X., Lunt R.R., Austin C.M., Forrest S.R., Broad spectral response using carbon nanotube/organic semiconductor/C60 photodetectors, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3354-3358.Google Scholar
Lu R.T., Christianson C., Kirkeminde A., Ren S.Q., Wu J., Extraordinary photocurrent harvesting at type-II heterojunction interfaces: toward high detectivity carbon nanotube infrared detectors, Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 6244-6249.Google Scholar
Wang Q.H., Kalantar-Zadeh K., Kis A., Coleman J.N., Strano M.S., Electronics and optoelectronics of two-dimensional transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 699-712.Google Scholar
Ding Y., Wang Y.L., Ni J., Shi L., Shi S.Q., Tang W.H., First principles study of structural, vibrational and electronic properties of graphene-like MX2 (M = Mo, Nb, W, Ta; X = S, Se, Te) monolayers, Physica B 2011, 406, 2254-2260.Google Scholar
Coehoorn R., Haas C., de Groot R.A., Electronic structure of MoSe2, MoS2, and WSe2, II, The nature of the optical band gaps, Phys. Rev. B 1987, 6203-6206.Google Scholar
Buscema M., Barkelid M., Zwiller V., Van der Zant H.S.J., Steele G.A., Castellanos-Gomez A., Large and tunable photothermoelectic effect in single-layer MoS2, Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 358-363.Google Scholar
Liu F., Shimotani H., Shang H., Kanagasekaran T., Zolyomi V., Drummond N., Falko V.I., Tanigaki K., High-sensitivity photodetectors based on multilayer GaTe flakes, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 752-760.Google Scholar
Yoffe A.D., Layer compounds, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1993, 3, 147-170.Google Scholar
Xia F.N., Wang H., Xiao D., Dubey M., Ramasubrananiam A., Two-dimensional material nanophotonics, Nat. Photon. 2014, 8, 899-907.Google Scholar
Yazawa M., Koguchi M., Hiruma K., Heteroepitaxial ultrafine wire-like growth of InAs on GaAs substrates, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1991, 58, 1080-1082.Google Scholar
Xia Y., Yang P., Sun Y., Wu Y., Mayers B., Gates B., Yin Y., Kim F., Yan H., One-dimensional nanostructure: synthesis, characterization and applications, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 353-389.Google Scholar
Kuykendall T., Ulrich P., Aloni S., Yang P., Complete composition tunability of InGaN nanowires using a combinatorial approach, Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 951-956.Google Scholar
Deng K.M., Li Liang, CdS nanoscale photodetectors, Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2619-2635.Google Scholar
Yan R.X., Gargas D., Yang P.D., Nanowire photonics, Nat. Photon. 2009, 3, 569-576.Google Scholar
Nolan M., O’Callaghan S., Fagas G., Greer J.C., Silicon nanowire band gap modification, Nano Lett. 2007, 7, 34-38.Google Scholar
Li Y., Qian F., Xiang J., Lieber C.M., Nanowire electronic and optoelectronic devices, Materials Today 2006, 9, 18-27.Google Scholar
Murray C.B., Norris D.J., Bawendi M.G., Synthesis and characterization of nearly Monodisperse CdE (E = S, Se, Te) semiconductor nanocrystallites, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8706-8715.Google Scholar
Stiff-Roberts A.D., Quantum-dot infrared photodetectors: a review, J. Nanophotonics 2009, 3, 031607.Google Scholar
Konstantatos G., Sargent E.H., Nanostructured materials for photon detection, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2010, 5, 391-400.Google Scholar
Schaller R.D., Klimov V.I., High efficiency carrier multiplication in PdSe nanocrystals: implications for solar energy conversion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 186601.Google Scholar
Clark S.W., Harbold J.M., Wise F.W., Resonant energy transfer in PbS quantum dots, J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 7302-7305.Google Scholar
Nozik A.J., Multiple exciton generation in semiconductor quantum dots, Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 457, 3-11.Google Scholar
Clifford J.P., Konstantatos G., Johnston K.W., Hoogland S., Levina L., Sargent H., Fast, sensitive and spectrally tuneable colloidal-quantum-dot photodetectors, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 40-44.Google Scholar
Rauch T., Boberl M., Tedde S.F., Furst J., Kovalenko M.V., Hesser G., Lemmer U., Wolfgang H., Hayden O., Near-infrared imaging with quantum-dot-sensitized organic photodiodes, Nat. Photon. 2009, 3, 332-336.Google Scholar
Gong X., Tong M.H., Xia Y.J., Cai W.Z., Moon J.S., Cao Y., Yu G., Shieh C.L., Nilsson B., Heeger A.J., High-detectivity polymer photodetectors with spectral response from 300 nm to 1450 nm, Science 2009, 325, 1665-1667.Google Scholar
Konstantatos G., Howard I., Fischer A., Hoogland S., Clifford J., Klem E., Levina L., Sargent E.H., Ultrasensitive solution-cast quantum dot photodetectors, Nature 2006, 442, 180-183.Google Scholar
Boberl M., Kovalenko M.V., Gamerith S., List E.J.W., Heiss W., Inkjet-printed nanocrystal photodetectors operating up to 3 μm wavelengths, Adv. Mater. 2007, 19, 3574-3578.Google Scholar
Martyniuk P., Rogalski A., Quantum-dot infrared photodetectors: status and outlook, Prog. Quant. Electron. 2008, 32, 89-120.Google Scholar
Knight M.W., Sobhani H., Nordlander P., Halas N.J., Photodetection with Active Optical Antennas, Science 2011, 332, 702-704.Google Scholar
Fan P.Y., Chettiar U.K., Cao L.Y., Afshinmanesh F., Engheta N., Brongersma M.L., An invisible metal–semiconductor photodetector, Nat. Photon. 2012, 6, 380–385.Google Scholar
Gu M.X., Bai P., Li E.P., Enhancing the reception of propagating surface plasmons using a nanoantenna, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2010, 22, 245-247.Google Scholar
Bai P., Gu M.X., Wei X.C., Li E.P., Electrical Detection of Plasmonic Waves Using an Ultra-compact Structure via a Nanocavity, Optics Express 2009, 17, 24349-24357.Google Scholar
Oulton R.F., Sorger V.J., Genov D.A., Pile D.F.P., Zhang X., A hybrid plasmonic waveguide for subwavelength confinement and long-range propagation, Nat. Photon. 2008, 2, 496-500.Google Scholar
Chu H.S., Akimov Y., Bai P., Li E.P., Hybrid dielectric-loaded plasmonic waveguide and wavelength selective components for efficiently controlling light at subwavelength scale, JOSA B 2011, 28, 2895–2901.Google Scholar
Chu H.S., Bai P., Li E.P., Hoefer W.J.R., Hybrid Dielectric-Loaded Plasmonic Waveguide-Based Power Splitter and Ring Resonator: Compact Size and High Optical Performance for Nanophotonic Circuit., Plasmonics 2011, 6, 591-597.Google Scholar
Ooi K.J.A., Bai P., Gu M.X., Ang L.K. Design of a monopoleantenna-based resonant nanocavity for detection of optical power from hybrid plasmonic waveguides, Optics Express 2011, 19, 17075–17085.Google Scholar
Gu M.X., Bai P., Chu H.S., Li E.P., Design of Subwavelength CMOS Compatible Plasmonic Photodetector for Nano-Electronic-Photonic Integrated Circuits, IEEE Photonic Tech. Lett. 2012, 24, 515–517.Google Scholar
Ooi K.J.A., Bai P., Gu M.X., Ang L.K., Plasmonic coupled-cavity system for enhancement of surface plasmon localization in plasmonic detectors, Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 275201.Google Scholar
Wang F.M., Melosh N.A., Plasmonic Energy Collection through Hot Carrier Extraction, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 5426–5430.Google Scholar
Romero I., Aizpurua J., Bryant G.W., De Abajo F.J.G., Plasmons in Nearly-Touching Metallic Nanoparticles: Singular Response in the Limit of Touching Dimers, Opt. Express 2006, 14, 9988–9999.Google Scholar
Lassiter J.B., Aizpurua J., Hernandez L.I., Brandl D.W., Romero I., Lal S., Hafner J.H., Nordlander P., Halas N.J., Close Encounters between Two Nanoshells, Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1212–1218.Google Scholar
Zuloaga J., Prodan E., Nordlander P., Quantum Description of the Plasmon Resonances of a Nanoparticle Dimer, Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 887–891.Google Scholar
Esteban R., Borisov A.G., Nordlander P., Aizpurua J., Bridging Quantum and Classical Plasmonics with a Quantum-Corrected Model, Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 825: 1-9.Google Scholar
Wu L., Duan H.G., Bai P., Bosman M., Yang J.K.W., Li E.P., Fowler-Nordheim Tunneling Induced Charge Transfer Plasmons between Nearly-Touching Nanoparticles, ACS Nano 2013, 7, 707–716.Google Scholar
Savage K.J., Hawkeye M.M., Esteban R., Borisov A.G., Aizpurua J., Baumberg J.J., Revealing the Quantum Regime in Tunneling Plasmonics, Nature 2012, 491, 574–577.Google Scholar
Tan S.F., Wu L., Yang J.K.W., Bai P., Bosman M., Nijhuis C.A., Quantum Plasmon Resonances Controlled by Molecular Tunnel Junctions, Science 2014, 343, 1496-1499.Google Scholar
Tame M.S., McEnery K.R., Özdemir S.K., Lee J., Maier S.A., Kim M.S., Quantum plasmonics., Nat. Phys. 2013, 9, 329–340.Google Scholar
Lee C.H., Lee G.H., Zande A.M.V.D., Chen W.C., Li Y.L., Han M.Y., Cui X., Arefe G., Nuckolls C., Heinz T.F., Guo J., Hone J., Kim P., Atomically thin p–n junctions with van der Waals heterointerfaces, Nat. Nanotech. 2014, 9, 676–681.Google Scholar